Evaluation

4


 3
 2
 1
Group effort/teamwork
 Worked well as a group, split up work evenly, and each group member completed individual tasks.
 Worked well as a group, but some group members did more than others. Each group member completed individual tasks. Did not function well as a group, work was not split up evenly, and only one group member completed work. Each member worked individually, majority of work was not assigned to a member, and work was incomplete.
Understanding of Social Responsibility
 All members of the group had a clear understanding of Social Responsibility and it was reflected in the work. 4 or more areas covered. Most group members had a clear understanding of Social Responsibility, and it was reflected in the work. 3 areas covered. Few group members had a clear understand of Social Responsibility and it was poorly reflected in work. Only 2 areas were covered. No group members had a clear understanding of Social Responsibility. 0-1 areas were covered.
Research Methods
 The group used provided resources as well as credible resources they found on their own to a great extent. The group used the provided resources as well as outside resource, and it was shown in the finished product.  The group only used the provided resources and had no additional outside resources. The group only used a few provided resources and no outside resources.

Presentation

(appearance)

 The presentation used vivid and eye catching colors and layouts. It was easy to follow and very original. The presentation was colorful  and they layout was somewhat eye catching.It was easy to follow and original. The presentation was dull in color and the layouts did not catch your eye. It was difficult to follow and not original. The presentation had no color and the layout was boring. It was impossible to follow and had no originality .

Presentation

(content)

The presentation covered at least 4 areas of SR and used credible resources. The presentation covered at least 3 areas of SR and used credible resources. The presentation covered at least 2 areas of SR but the resources used were not credible. The presentation only covered 1 area of SR and had no sources.