Evaluation
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Group Cohesion
|
Group members work marginally well together. The group roles did not work effectively. Students did not delegate their roles accordingly. | Group members work well together. The group roles worked well together. The group took roles seriously and equally participated. | Group members work exceptionally well together. The group roles worked out very well and group members accomplished the task as an equal unit. | |
|
Facebook Page
|
The layout of the facebook page is not well-designed with some kinks. Many of the requirements have not been included in the facebook page with little detail. Grammer and setnence structure are not well crafted. There are many mistakes throughtout page. | The layout of the facebook page is well- designed. Most of the requirements have been included in decent detail. Grammer and sentence structure are almost exceptional. | The layout of the facebook page is exceptionally well- desgined. All the requirements have been included in great detail. Grammer and sentence structure are well crafted. | |
|
Presentation
|
Group presenters do not have equal roles in speaking. One or two members dominate the speaking. Many requirements are left out in presentation and students presenting seem to have a weak understanding of content. | Group presenters have a more equal presentation where all members are speaking. Most of the requirements are brought up in presentation with a decent understanding of content. | Group presenters have a complete equal presentation. All members speak about the page and no one dominates the talking. All required material is brought up in presentation with a solid understanding of content. |