Evaluation
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Justification of Alternative Fuel Source and relationship to Law of Conservation
|
Group examined their alternative fuel source but failed to completely fulfill all tasks, explain relationship conservation of energy and did not fully justify possible investment | Group showed effort in assessing Fuel Source, considered most of the possible benefits, explained in better depth the relationship to conservation of energy and justified possible investment |
Group analyzed fuel source, considered all possible benefits,fulfilled all tasks, fully explained relationship to to conservation of energy and justified possible investment |
Group assessed topic carefully, analyzed fuel source, considered all possible benefits and draw backs, fulfilled all tasks, explained in detail the relationship to to conservation of energy and and fully justified possible investment in a way that was professional |
|
|
Evaluation of Price Per Gallon
|
Group examined the price per gallon but failed to completely explain task |
Group showed effort in assessing price per gallon, and explained the results with their research |
Group analyzed price per gallon, and used solid research, concise sentences and clarity in order to explain findings | Group assessed price per gallon carefully, analyzed the topic, considered the investors in their research and used solid research, concise sentences and clarity in order to explain findings |
|
|
Evaluation of infrastructure
|
Group examined the infrastructure but failed to completely explain task | Group showed effort in assessing infrastructure, and explained the results with their research |
Group analyzed infrastructure using solid research, concise sentences and clarity. |
Group assessed infrastructure carefully, analyzed the topic, considered the investors in their research and used solid research, concise sentences and clarity in order to explain findings |
|
|
Evaluation of emissions
|
Group examined the emissions but failed to completely explain task |
Group showed effort in assessing emissions, and explained the results with their research |
Group analyzed emissions using solid research, concise sentences and clarity. |
Group assessed emissions carefully, analyzed the topic, considered the investors in their research and used solid research, concise sentences and clarity in order to explain findings |
|
|
Effectiveness of PowerPoint
|
Group developed PowerPoint but failed to include all aspects and make it visually appealing | Group developed a thought out PowerPoint assessed most tasks and included some pictures in order to make it visually appealing |
Group developed a solid and thought out PowerPoint, assessed all tasks and included pictures and graphs in order to make it both informational and visually appealing |
Group developed a professional, solid and thought out PowerPoint, assessed all tasks and included countless pictures and graphs in order to make it both informational and visually appealing |
|
|
Group Dynamic and Cooperation
|
Group worked mostly well together but members did not all contribute | Group worked well together with most members performing their assigned role and contributing |
Group worked as a team,with members performing their assigned role and contributing and as well as motivating one another |
Group chose roles carefully, worked well as a team, with members performing their assigned role and contributing and as well as motivating one another |