Evaluation
|
Poor 0-3 |
Developing 4-6 |
Accomplished 7-8 |
Exemplary 9-10 |
Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Completion of task one
|
Very little effort has been made to complete the task. Map is untidy and incomplete | Map is reasonably neat, pictures and relevant facts included |
The elements of the task have been completed accurately and neatly |
All elements of the task are accurately and immaculately completed | |
|
Completion of task two |
Very little effort has been made to complete the task |
Some of the tasks have been accurately completed. |
There is a high level of accuracy in the task |
All elements of the task are accurately completed |
|
|
Completion of task3 ( this mark has double weighting, ie. multiply by 2) |
Little effort has been made to develop a thoughtful itinerary or to give reasons for choices |
A basic effort to complete the taask with some evidence of research and but little effective reasoning. |
A competent itinerary that gives reasons for the group's decisions and shows some understanding of Paris |
A well reasoned and logical trip with which shows evidence of in-depth research and an understanding of Paris | |
|
Presentation (This task has .5 weighting. ie. divide by 2 ) |
Poor presentation. Unpleasant to display. | Some effort has been made to present this work so it is worthy of display. |
Visually attractive but perhaps not of the highest standard. | Visually excellent presentation. |
|
|
Self Evaluation (This task has .5 weighting. ie. divide by 2 ) |
Little effort to analyse the group's work. Little insight indicated. | Self evaluation shows some thoughtfulness and covers most aspects |
Self evaluation covers all or aspects and shows insight into group performance |
Very considered, well developed group self evaluation covering all aspects |
|