Evaluation
|
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Research |
Presentation shows no evidence of research and appears to be the opinion of the presenter only. | Presentation shows evidence of research from a single source. | Presentation shows research from more then two sources. | Presentation shows thorough research on all aspects of assigned role | |
|
PowerPoint |
PowerPoint is incomplete or unreadable; theory is not explained. | PowerPoint is not well-designed, presentation of theory is not clear. | PowerPoint is clear and well-designed but theory is not entirely clear. | PowerPoint is well-designed, clear, and focused, and theory is clearly explained and evaluated. | |
|
Class Presentation |
Presentation in class is unfocused and off-topic. | Presentation in class is unclear or unfocused; group members are silly or uninvolved. | Presentation in class is clear and focused but there is no clear argument for why the theory is best for our school. | Presentation in class is clear, focused and professional; the case for why the theory is best for our school is well argued. | |
|
Group Work |
One group member did most of the work while others were off-task. | Some group members were off-task much of the time. |
Some group members were off task at times |
All members participated at every level of the project. | |
|
Honor Statement Compliance |
PowerPoint is copied from another source. | Some text is copied directly from another source; image sources are not named. | All text is original but image sources are not named. | All text is original, images in PowerPoint are referenced. |