This is the Rubric for
grading two web pages you have chosen to compare. A rubric is a fair,
consistent way of giving points or a grade to a project. The grade you give the
website will depend on the website content, presentation, ease of use, and completeness
of information provided.
At the bottom, you are
expected to give your personal opinion of each of the websites. Here is where
you explain why you liked one better than the other, and if you would revisit
one website again instead of another, and tell us why.
Web pages are to be picked
from the list of websites used in Sidebar #3, which explain the basic rules of
the game of chess.
Print this rubric, and
clearly mark which website you are naming Website #1, and which you are calling
Website #2.
Complete this rubric page,
and hand it in as part of your Webquest assignment
for Sidebar #3.
|
Name: |
Date: |
Class: |
|||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Poor +1 |
Below Average +2 |
Average +3 |
Above
Average +4 |
Excellent +5 |
Score for Website
#1 |
Score for Website
#2 |
|
Goal of the website |
Goal is unclear and confusing |
Website has conflicting themes; uncertain goal |
Goal is clear, but has distracting or unrelated
elements |
Clear purpose and goal; some elements seem
unnecessary |
Goal and purpose of site clear, with no distracting
elements |
|
|
|
User Friendliness |
Site is unwelcome to users |
Site does not evoke a welcoming message |
Site welcomes visitors but seems unfriendly |
Site is welcoming and appears friendly |
Site is exciting, welcoming and very user friendly |
|
|
|
Design |
Poorly organized; obvious errors; loads slowly; hard
to read |
Organization somewhat confusing; some errors, loads
slowly |
Organization acceptable; no obvious errors; loads
adequately; easy to read |
Good organization; no errors; loads quickly; easy to
read |
Excellent organization; free of errors; loads
quickly and clearly; all elements easy to read |
|
|
|
Navigation on site |
Difficult to find and follow site navigation links |
Navigation links visible but somewhat confusing |
Navigation links clear and readily available |
Navigation links clear and logical; site map
included |
Navigation logical and clear; site map and search
engine available |
|
|
|
Content |
Content limited; lacks relevance to topic |
Content appears relevant, but quantity limited |
Content is adequate in relevance and quantity for
this topic |
Content is relevant and quantity is sufficient for
this topic |
Content is on target and provides excellent coverage
for the topic |
|
|
|
Website #1: |
|||||||
|
Your opinion: |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Website #2: |
|||||||
|
Your opinion: |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||