Evaluation
| 4 Points |
3 Points |
2 points |
1 Point |
Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Data Collection
| Resources, such as web sites and professional organizations, are clearly identified. Web-based data has been checked for accuracy. | Resources are listed with one or two missing important information, such as web-site address. | Resources are not listed in a clearly defined way or are missing information. | There is no indication of resources used or how information is gathered. | |
|
Writing
|
There is a logical flow of thought. There are no formatting errors. Proper citations are provided for all sources. |
Some information is illogically placed. There are a few formatting errors. Some citations are not provided. | The project is written with one or two grammatical mistakes or spelling errors. It does not flow logically. Proper citations are missing. | many spelling and grammatical errors. No logical flow in thought and no citations are provided. | |
|
Persuasion
| Writing is very discriptive giving the reader the impression of high understanding. Presentation is of exceptional quality clearly shows the best solution. | It is apparent that the writer has some knowledge of the subject matter. Presentation does a nice job outlining the products and services | Presentation is merely cut and pasted slides from the various web sites. Writing shows little comprehension of the subject matter. | Presentation is incomplete and only has information from one service provider. Writing is elementary, giving the reader the impression that they could have done it themselves. | |
|
Collaboration
| Team cooperation was a shared responsibility and each member contributed equally to the activity, worked to take responsibility and resolve conflicts. | In general, team cooperation was a shared responsibility. However, sometimes one team member did not take full responsibility for his/her work or help to resolve conflicts. | Responsibility for work to be completed was led by one member. There were many conflicts. | There was no team cooperation. No one took responsibility for the work to be completed. | |
|
Creativity
| The presentation is of high technical quality with a novel approach to depicting the information using all of the talents of the team members. The presentation color, graphics, and layout attract attention, and are visually appealing. | The presentation is of good technical quality. It has some imaginative qualities and utilizes the talents of the team members. | The presentation is of good technical quality. It is a copy of someone else’s work and was developed by half of the team. | The presentation is of poor technical quality. It was developed by one team member. | |