Evaluation
Please scroll way down to see the following rubric
|
CRITERIA |
Weak/ Unsatisfactory |
Limited Understanding Demonstrated |
Satisfactory |
Good/Demonstrated Understanding of Skill |
Exceptional Error Free |
|
INTRODUCTION/ CONCLUSION |
Missing or unclear. |
Attempt weak. |
Adequate but needs work. |
Introduction prepares audience, contains thesis, needs works. Good conclusion that needs only minor modifications. |
Well worded, prepares the audience, and summarizes. |
|
ORGANIZATION/FORMAT/ NEATNESS |
Lacked a logical sequence or flow. Sloppy. |
Some attempt made but at times unorganized & difficult to follow. |
Adequate organization that requires improvement. |
Focused, organized clearly, contained transitions, and mostly flowed well. |
Clearly ordered, focused, flowed smoothly, and utilized transitions. Professionally formatted. |
|
CONTENT (knowledge of subject, supporting material, grammar, sentence structure, development of ideas, and professionalism |
Content is weak. Ideas are poorly developed. A lack of preparedness. |
Some attempt at content development is evident but needs major improvement. Not all questions are addressed. |
The content is adequate but more preparation is needed. Attempt to address all questions. |
Well prepared with strong content and only minor errors. Most questions addressed well. |
Exemplary content that indicated an outstanding effort on the part of the presenter. All ideas are fully developed. All questions are answered and fully explored. |
|
IMAGES |
Visual aides not used. |
Ill prepared, distracting, and/or not properly cited. |
Adequate; however, some problems evident. |
Good usage with minor improvements needed. |
Presentation design is aesthetically pleasing and visual elements support (rather than detract from) the learning experience. Supportive, and created interest. All our properly cited. |