Evaluation
Please scroll way down to see the rubric
CRITERIA Weak/ Unsatisfactory Limited Understanding Demonstrated Satisfactory Good/Demonstrated Understanding of Skill Exceptional Error Free INTRODUCTION/ CONCLUSION Missing or unclear. Attempt weak. Adequate but needs work. Introduction prepares audience, contains thesis, needs works. Good conclusion that needs only minor modifications. Well worded, prepares the audience, and summarizes. ORGANIZATION/FORMAT/ NEATNESS Lacked a logical sequence or flow. Sloppy. Some attempt made but at times unorganized & difficult to follow. Adequate organization that requires improvement. Focused, organized clearly, contained transitions, and mostly flowed well. Clearly ordered, focused, flowed smoothly, and utilized transitions. Professionally formatted. CONTENT (knowledge of subject, supporting material, grammar, sentence structure, development of ideas, and professionalism Content is weak. Ideas are poorly developed. A lack of preparedness. Some attempt at content development is evident but needs major improvement. Not all questions are addressed. The content is adequate but more preparation is needed. Attempt to address all questions. Well prepared with strong content and only minor errors. Most questions addressed well. Exemplary content that indicated an outstanding effort on the part of the presenter. All ideas are fully developed. All questions are answered and fully explored. IMAGES Visual aides not used. Ill prepared, distracting, and/or not properly cited. Adequate; however, some problems evident. Good usage with minor improvements needed. Presentation design is aesthetically pleasing and visual elements support (rather than detract from) the learning experience. Supportive, and created interest. All our properly cited.
