On the Brink of Cold War: Evaluation

Evaluation

	Below Average 1	A working progress 2	Great potential 3	Exemplary 4
ORAL PRESENTATION	Ideas and argument presented are rambling. Presenter: muffled, has inappropriate tone or poise throughout presentation. He/She does not adhere at all to the time limit. (0-3)	Ideas and argument presented are partially relevant. However, presentation is vague and haphazard. Presenter: lacks voice clarity, inconsistent tone or poise during presentation. He/She makes a poor attempt to keep to the time limit. (4-7)	Ideas and argument presented are relevant and coherent, though a little uneven at some parts. Presenter: acceptable voice clarity, appropriate tone or poise for some parts of the presentation. keeps to the time limit. (8-11)	Ideas and argument are highly relevant, clear and concise, and developed coherently. Presenter: has excellent voice clarity, correct tone or poise for most parts of presentation and keeps to the time limit. (12-15)
WRITTEN PROPOSAL	Proposal has no clear structure, ideas and argument poorly developed, points are brief and sketchy with little or no supporting evidence, gross factual errors. (0-2)	Proposal has structure but in poor order, ideas and argument half-heartedly developed, points are valid and elaborated with vague supporting evidence; some factual errors. (3-5)	Proposal has a logical structure for some parts. There is genuine attempt to develop ideas and argument, albeit an uneven one. Points are concise and supported with correct evidence, but not tied properly together for overall substantiation. (6-8)	Proposal has a clear and logical structure throughout. Ideas and argument defined and developed smoothly. Points are concise and supported with suitably quoted evidence, which lends good substantiation to overall argument. (9-10)
ONLINE LOGBOOK ENTRIES	Entries are rare, with rambling and totally irrelevant content. They do not show any reflections or thoughts concerning the learning progress at different phases of the project. (0-2)	Entries are irregular, with superficial or largely irrelevant content. They do not show genuine attempts towards reflections or thoughts concerning the learning progress at different phases of the project. (3-5)	Entries are mostly regular, with partially relevant content. They show a genuine attempt at reflections or thoughts concerning the learning progress at different phases of the project. (6-8)	Entries are complete (1 daily), with highly relevant content. They show genuine and thought-provoking reflections or interesting revelations concerning the learning progress at different phases of the project. (9-10)

Below Average

A working progress

Great potential

Exemplary

Score

ORAL PRESENTATION

Ideas and argument presented are rambling. Presenter: muffled, has inappropriate tone or poise throughout presentation. He/She does not adhere at all to the time limit.

(0-3)

Ideas and argument presented are partially relevant. However, presentation is vague and haphazard. Presenter: lacks voice clarity, inconsistent tone or poise during presentation. He/She makes a poor attempt to keep to the time limit.

(4-7)

Ideas and argument presented are relevant and coherent, though a little uneven at some parts. Presenter: acceptable voice clarity, appropriate tone or poise for some parts of the presentation. keeps to the time limit.

(8-11)

Ideas and argument are highly relevant, clear and concise, and developed coherently. Presenter: has excellent voice clarity, correct tone or poise for most parts of presentation and keeps to the time limit.

(12-15)

WRITTEN PROPOSAL

Proposal has no clear structure, ideas and argument poorly developed, points are brief and sketchy with little or no supporting evidence, gross factual errors.

(0-2)

Proposal has structure but in poor order, ideas and argument half-heartedly developed, points are valid and elaborated with vague supporting evidence; some factual errors.

(3-5)

Proposal has a logical structure for some parts. There is genuine attempt to develop ideas and argument, albeit an uneven one. Points are concise and supported with correct evidence, but not tied properly together for overall substantiation.

(6-8)

Proposal has a clear and logical structure throughout. Ideas and argument defined and developed smoothly. Points are concise and supported with suitably quoted evidence, which lends good substantiation to overall argument.

(9-10)

ONLINE LOGBOOK ENTRIES

Entries are rare, with rambling and totally irrelevant content. They do not show any reflections or thoughts concerning the learning progress at different phases of the project.

(0-2)

Entries are irregular, with superficial or largely irrelevant content. They do not show genuine attempts towards reflections or thoughts concerning the learning progress at different phases of the project.

(3-5)

Entries are mostly regular, with partially relevant content. They show a genuine attempt at reflections or thoughts concerning the learning progress at different phases of the project.

(6-8)

Entries are complete (1 daily), with highly relevant content. They show genuine and thought-provoking reflections or interesting revelations concerning the learning progress at different phases of the project.

(9-10)