Evaluation
|
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Understanding of geometric principles (volume, area, unit rate, and relationships)
|
Does not use geometric terms, or uses them incorrectly. Presentation of processes used to determine unit rate is missing or completely incorrect. |
Correct use of geometric terms is inconsistent. Explanation of geometric process begins to show understanding, but is incomplete or only partially correct. |
Generally uses geometric terms correctly. Explanation of geometric process shows basic understanding of the relationships between unit rate, area, and volume. |
Uses geometric terms correctly. Thoroughly demonstrates understanding of how volume and surface area determine the unit rate. |
|
|
Using geometric formulas |
Generally uses incorrect formula, or does not use formulas at all. Enters incorrect information into formulas. Consistently fails to generate accurate solutions. |
Occasionally uses correct formulas, and sometimes enters correct information into those formulas. Frequently fails to generate accurate solutions. |
Generally chooses appropriate formulas for different tasks. Enters correct numbers into formulas and calculates correct solutions with reasonable consistency. |
Thoroughly demonstrates understanding of which geometric formulas to use, when to use them, and why. Enters numbers into formulas and calculates solutions correctly. |
|
|
Creating prototype |
Prototype is neither a cylinder nor a prism. Little or no obvious effort to make package appealing to consumers. Work is sloppy or incomplete. |
Prototype is either of an inappropriate shape or shows little effort to appeal to consumers. Work is sloppy or incomplete. |
Prototype is a cylinder or prism. Demonstrates some effort to appeal to consumers. Work is generally neat. |
Prototype is a cylinder or a prism. Demonstrates extensive effort to make package appealing to consumers. Work is tidy and shows attention to detail. |
|
|
Persuasive writing skills
|
Does not state position. Provides no appropriate evidence. Lacks organization; content is confusing or difficult to follow. |
May fail to state position clearly. Lacks sufficient evidence, or evidence isn't consistently appropriate. Organization may not be clear or easy to follow. |
Provides a reasonable argument with more than one appropriate pieces of evidence. Explains value of evidence. Clearly organized and easy to follow. |
Provides compelling evidence to support thesis and convincingly explains the value of that evidence. Clearly organized and easy to follow. |
|
| Business letter formatting |
Does not use any business letter formatting. |
Some attempt to use correct formatting, but some elements are missing, incomplete, or spaced incorrectly. |
Formatting generally correct; may lack an element and/or have minor errors in spacing. |
Contains all elements of a business letter, organized and spaced correctly. |
|
|
Writing mechanics
|
Mechanical errors interfere substantially with the reader's understanding . |
Mechanical errors distract reader from the content. |
A few minor mechanical errors do not interfere with the reader's experience. |
Few if any mechanical errors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|